Male Contribution to Reproduction: A Random Occurrence or Indicator of Population Status?

Male Contribution to Reproduction: A Random Occurrence or Indicator of Population Status?

By Garrett Roberts, AQP Research Technician/Graduate Student, originally published in the Summer 2022 edition of Quail Call. 

Male contribution to reproductive output and its importance to population recovery and persistence in bobwhite quail is an understudied topic commonly overlooked in research. We know already that males tend to contribute more to total reproductive output in lower density/recovering populations, but what we don’t understand as well, is how much and when they contribute under other circumstances. Bobwhite quail exhibit a form of mating strategy known as ambisexual polygamy.

This is where both the male and female will contribute to parental care, both during incubation and after hatching. Both sexes will also have multiple mates throughout the summer breeding season.

Females are generally the targeted sex studied during this time, resulting in minimal return data for the male bobwhites throughout the season. The aim for this study is to analyze the variability of male contribution over time and between bobwhite populations on the primary study site of the Albany Quail Project, Tall Timbers, Livingston Place, The Jones Center at Ichauway, and Central Florida. All of these study sites have varying spring breeding densities, possibly resulting in varying levels of male contribution.

Starting this year, we have begun increasing our sample size of radio-tagged males on all study areas to gain a better understanding of their relative contribution to reproductive output. This data is being used for a master’s project for the current research technician and new graduate student of the Albany Quail Project, Garrett Roberts. Garrett is a North Alabama transplant, graduate of Auburn University, and has been with AQP for the past year.

This project will be ongoing for the next several years with the intent of determining how male contribution varies on sites with different densities and varying seasonal survivals. This valuable insight should show just how big of a role males play in the success of reproduction and the overall growth of the population.

 

Are Bobwhites Becoming More Wary?

Are Bobwhites Becoming More Wary?

By Justin Rectenwald | Project Collaborators: Albany Quail Project, Livingston Place, Central Florida Rangeland Quail Program, Tall Timbers, Ichauway, Rolling Plains Quail Research Ranch, originally published in the Summer 2022 edition of Quail Call. 

In 1931, Herbert Stoddard posed the question, “Are bobwhites becoming more wary?” in his classic book The Bobwhite Quail. He described how veteran quail hunters of that era with 30 or 40 years’ experience agreed that birds were getting more educated and more difficult to kill. He expounded on the fact that the birds had become quite unruly as they were becoming hard to mark down and shoot singles after the initial covey rise.

Stoddard further explained that on grounds that were becoming “heavily stocked” (at >1 bird per acre), that it was a new experience “to see the majority of coveys habitually flush out of shooting distance.” Even then, Stoddard asked, “How far will the process of education be carried?” The words written by Stoddard nearly 100 years ago sound eerily similar those we hear today. Unfortunately, this process of education has not seemed to slow down.

To address this question, the Albany Quail Project began a study nearly 30 years ago on several Albany area plantations that lasted for eight hunting seasons, and was aimed at understanding how radio-tagged coveys were interacting with the hunting party. The general consensus was that the hunting party only saw about half of the coveys that were available (most of which were pointed), and the other half that were not seen mostly held tight to avoid being detected.

Since the early 1990s, bird densities have at least doubled on many places and we have recently seen a string of years with above average adult survival that have resulted in an older and perhaps wiser age structure along with high fall densities. Both of these factors have likely played a large part in explaining why the birds have been much wilder and harder to get shots at. Because of this unruly behavior that has been observed over the last few years, there is a renewed interest in revisiting this study from the 1990s, to determine if birds are becoming even warier than they were in the past.

We restarted our covey-hunter interaction study this past season on several sites across the bobwhite range, including the primary study site of the Albany Quail Project, Livingston Place, Escape Ranch, Tall Timbers, Ichauway, and the Rolling Plains Quail Research Ranch in Texas. Our aim is to see how bobwhite behave compared to the original study in the 1990s, and to see how this varies between study sites.

We believe that the way coveys interact with hunters will vary between sites based on a variety of factors: bird density, age structure, cover conditions, and hunting style. We expect that on sites with higher densities and age structures that favor older, wiser birds, that the hunting party will see a higher percentage of coveys flushing wild, and fewer that are holding tight.

Beginning last fall, our staff of biologists and technicians rode along with the hunting parties on these six properties and tracked radio-tagged coveys to record what percentage are seen and how they are evading detection. After over 500 encounters in the first hunting season, preliminary results indicate that modern coveys seem much less likely to “hold” to avoid detection and are flushing wild about 30% more often than they did in the 1990s. It is unclear how much of these behaviors is being learned and how much is the result of being in a high-density population with high adult survival. We will continue this study for several more years to fully understand how far this process of education can be carried, and how much warier the birds have become.

Examining Crippling Loss Rates Across the Bobwhite Range

By Justin Rectenwald | Project Collaborators: Albany Quail Project, Livingston Place, Central Florida Rangeland Quail Program, Tall Timbers, Ichauway, Rolling Plains Quail Research Ranch, University of Georgia–GAME Lab, originally published in the Summer 2022 edition of Quail Call. 

Over the last several years, there have been many discussions between quail managers, property owners, and biologists about how harvest rates may affect wild quail populations. As wise stewards of the resource, our goal should be to maximize hunting opportunity, while minimizing any potential negative impacts on the population. Historically, the idea of over-hunting or pressuring bobwhites has not been an issue, because they have relatively high densities and low harvest pressure.

While populations on large private properties remain high and stable, ownership demographics and the economics of quail hunting have changed slightly in recent years. It has become more common for quail properties to have multiple owners that all want their fair share of hunting days, or they are looking for ways to offset the operating costs by leasing days to other hunters. Both of these situations can lead to an increase in the number of days hunting, which could equate to higher harvest pressure. Tall Timbers and others in the past have developed the industry standard for harvest rates, which sits at 15% of the fall population.

However, the kicker is that the recommendation of 15% is supposed to include birds that are crippled and not recovered as well. While it is easy to figure out how many birds you bring back to the wagon, we do not have a firm grasp on how many birds are actually crippled, and end up dying days or weeks later. Many believe, based on observations, that the current ratio of harvested to crippled birds could be anywhere from 3:1 to 1:1 depending on hunter experience and or a variety of other factors. While a higher than perceived harvest rate may not be a cause of concern on most properties, it may be a limiting factor on properties that are already pushing the 15% recommendation.

Many believe, based on observations, that the current ratio of harvested to crippled birds could be anywhere from 3:1 to 1:1 depending on hunter experience and or a variety of other factors. While a higher than perceived harvest rate may not be a cause of concern on most properties, it may be a limiting factor on properties that are already pushing the 15% recommendation.

To determine the true crippling loss rate, Tall Timbers and the GAME Lab at the University of Georgia began a collaborative study that takes place on our primary study site in Albany, the Jones Center at Ichauway, Livingston Place, Tall Timbers, Escape Ranch in Central Florida, and the Rolling Plains Quail Research Ranch in Texas. Our staff of biologists and technicians tracked radio-tagged coveys during the hunts throughout this past season and recorded data on which coveys were shot into, the number of shots fired at each covey rise, the number of birds that were shot down and recovered, the number wounded that kept flying, and the number shot down and not recovered.

On the day after the hunt and 3–5 days later, we rechecked those same coveys in hopes of recovering whole, un-scavenged birds that were initially wounded during the hunt and later died as a result of their injuries. Our staff recovered whole birds on multiple occasions following hunts, and these birds were x-rayed and sent to have official necropsies performed to determine their actual cause of death. Figure 1 depicts several of these birds that were confirmed to have had lead shot in them by x-ray.

We will continue this study for the next few hunting seasons in hopes of providing a true estimate of crippling loss. We expect to see variations in the crippling loss rate, but we should eventually be able to determine how many birds are recovered, wounded, and lost for every 10 shots fired at the end of this study. While it will take multiple years of data collection to complete the study, our preliminary results indicate that for about every 2 or 3 birds picked up, there is another 1 that is crippled and not recovered. We will continue this study for the next several hunting seasons and will expand on the results and conclusions once we have a full understanding of the true crippling loss rate.

New Collaborative Project with The Jones Center at Ichauway Launches

Originally published in the Summer 2022 edition of Quail Call. 

In the last few years, the Jones Center at Ichauway (a historic 29,000-acre wildlife and forest ecology research facility in Baker County, Ga.) has renewed its emphasis on their quail management and hunting program. The conservation and research staff at Ichauway reached out to the staff at the Albany Quail Project (AQP) and Mississippi State University (MSU) to establish a collaborative study group to get a better grasp on their baseline demographics.

Last fall, the AQP helped to deploy radios on quail for the first time ever on Ichauway to assist a MSU graduate student who is studying quail behavior around prescribed fire. The project also aims to determine if any bottlenecks in survival or reproduction exist. Ichauway is also serving as a replicate study site for our on-going crippling loss, hunting interaction, and male contribution to reproduction studies. We look forward to working with the staff of Ichauway and MSU in the future to help make more informed decisions on management that will further bolster their quail population.