Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Research Biologist, Angie Reid, represents SRM in Washington

The following is a report by Angie Reid, Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Research Biologist, on her recent trip to Washington, DC to meet with members of Congress. She was part of a delegation from the Society for Range Management (SRM) that discussed policy issues affecting rangelands. Angie has been a Tall Timbers research staff member since 2010, and is the Treasurer of the Florida Section of the SRM.

Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Research Biologist, Angie Reid, represents SRM in Washington

By Angie Reid, Fire Ecology Research Biologist II

Angie Reid in front of the Capitol in WashingtonI have been involved with the Society for Range Management (SRM) since my freshman year at Texas Tech University in 2002. I was a past President of the Texas Tech Section of the SRM, and am now President of the national Young Professionals Conclave (YPC) of the SRM and the Treasurer of the Florida Section of the SRM. As the leader of the YPC and an active and committed member of the SRM, I was invited this year to accompany the SRM Board of Directors to Washington, DC for the annual DC Fly-in. The Florida SRM is mostly active in the central and southern parts of the state where large cattle ranches still exist. Although the Red Hills region is no longer a large cattle producing region, it was once the home of cracker cowboys and cattle operations. Like Tall Timbers, the SRM supports many conservation programs in the Farm Bill that are also used in the Red Hills region for habitat improvement.

In preparation for the trip, I studied policy issues relevant to both our region (the southeast) and out west. I must admit I’m not much of a policy buff but I learned a lot in the weeks leading up to the Fly-in. My role was to be a representative for the young professionals in the SRM, and more importantly to observe and learn how the SRM functions in Washington to accomplish the society’s goals and improve the position of its members in governmental positions and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) alike.

I worked with a high caliber team of individuals representing the SRM: Gary Frasier-current President of the SRM, who is retired from USDA-Agricultural Research Service; Jenny Pluhar-Second Vice President and a private consultant; Wally Butler – First Vice President and a Range and Livestock Specialist for the Idaho Farm Bureau Federation; Keith Klement – SRM Director 2010-2012 and professor at Sheridan College. Guiding us during the Fly-in were Jess Peterson, Executive Vice President of the SRM, and Kelly Fogarty, SRM’s DC liaison.

Angie Reid, third from left, with Society of Rangeland Management representatives

Angie Reid, third from left, with Society of Rangeland Management representatives.

This year’s Fly-in took a different approach than in past years. We sought to make SRM the experts and go-to group for all information regarding rangelands for congressional members, their staff and agency personnel we met. Many groups meeting with high-level agency officials and members of congress ask solely for funding; the SRM group focused on how we could help them by providing rapid response, science-based information on rangeland issues. By establishing the SRM as rangeland experts and creating a good rapport with officials in Washington, the SRM will have a larger voice in policy issues concerning our rangelands. 

We also discussed the importance of continued levels of funding for Farm Bill programs, explaining that lowered levels will only lead to increased expenses later, in order to restore the habitats that were underfunded this time around. Also discussed at each meeting was maintaining current levels of funding for agencies to ensure that field staff is able to focus on management rather than litigation. Additionally we discussed SRM’s collaboration with the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to conduct money-saving interagency training for Ecological Site Descriptions, while urging the US Forest Service (USFS) to get more involved in the collaboration. Other important issues we focused on were: specific budget constraints within the BLM, NRCS, and USF; support from agency staff for the Job Fair held at the annual SRM meetings; and funding for sage grouse conservation programs. I also had several opportunities to talk about the new Working Lands for Wildlife initiative involving NRCS and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the need for appropriate requirements for fire return intervals associated with conservation program contracts (e.g. WHIP).

These messages were carried by the SRM representatives to a diverse group in Washington, DC. We met with senior agency staff of NRCS, USFS, and the BLM, including NRCS Chief Dave White, acting BLM Range Division Chief Mike DeArmond, USDA Under-Secretary and Deputy Under-Secretary of Natural Resources and Environment, and Executive Director of the Public Lands Council and that was just the first day! On day two we headed to Capitol Hill for a Wyoming Senate Delegation “meet and greet” where Keith Klement spoke with Senators Enzi and Barasso about the Grazing Improvement Act and had meetings with a staff member of Senator Reed who is on the Senate Appropriations Committee, and Congressman Mike Simpson and Congresswoman Cynthia Lummis who both sit on the House Appropriations Committee.  We also managed to squeeze in meetings with representatives from The Wildlife Society and the American Seed Trade Association. 

After an impressive two days of meetings, I think the group was able to successfully establish the SRM as an authority on natural resource management on rangelands, and show that the SRM was an organization worthy of support with regard to the workshops, interagency collaborations, and certifications the SRM provides to agencies and private range managers alike. Members of Congress and agency officials we met with received a SRM statement paper on sage grouse, as an example of the expertise that can be provided. Since arriving back from the trip, the group has agreed on report language to be used by the Senate Appropriations Committee in support of Ecological Site Description development and application. This trip created lasting relationships and a shining reputation for SRM in Washington, DC. I was glad to be a part of it.

The Prescribed Fire Training Center is holding a Workshop for Resource Specialists – Dec 2 – 7, 2012

The Prescribed Fire Training Center is holding a Workshop for Resource Specialists – Dec 2 – 7, 2012

Who?

Prescribed Fire Training Center logo

Resource Specialists, which may include but are not limited to: Wildlife Biologists, Hydrologists, Range Managers, Forestry and Silviculture Specialists and Techs, Land Managers, Botanists, Archeologists, and any discipline that may benefit or be affected by the presence/absence of fire.

Course Objectives

This workshop’s flexible curriculum is based on the participant’s expectations. The schedule is a combination of classroom presentations, discussions, projects and field trips to various managed areas with active fire programs. The overarching goals are to pro-mote the attendee’s knowledge of fire as a management tool and to engage the resource specialist’s active participation in a prescribed fire program by:

  • Facilitating the exchange of experience and knowledge among and between cadre and participants

  • Identifying the differences in fire effects between prescribed fire and wildfire

  • Exposing participants to resource management programs that are successfully con-ducting a burn program through an interdisciplinary approach

  • Addressing fire utilization for resource benefit. Discussing concerns and mitigation steps necessary to incorporate resource needs with fire program needs.

Location

The Workshop will be held in Florida, the location to be determined by weather and field activity opportunities. However, field trips will be taken in a variety of sites and management agencies.

Application Deadline is October 25, 2012.For Additional Information and Application Form Visit the PFTC Website http://www.fws.gov/fire/pftc/

Contact

Greg Seamon, Fire Training Specialist, 850.523.8631 (office); 850.556.8613 (cell); gseamon@tnc.org

Fire frequency and hardwood re-sprouting

Fire frequency and hardwood re-sprouting

Fire frequency and hardwood re-sprouting

By Kevin Robertson, Fire Ecology Research Scientist

One of the primary goals of prescribed burning in southern pine forests is killing the above-ground portion of hardwoods such as oaks and hickories ("top killing") to promote the growth and survival of pine and herb species. These hardwood species typically re-sprout after being top-killed, which requires them to be burned again soon after. 

We conducted research to look at the response of hardwood resprouting to burning at one versus two-year fire return intervals, in the late winter (February-March) versus the early growing season (April-June), and in old-field pine versus native longleaf pine communities. We followed individual resprouting hardwood plants of multiple species for five years, comparing their above-ground biomass at the end of one fire-free interval with their above-ground biomass at the end of a second fire free interval, to see if there was a net growth or decrease in biomass over time under the different fire regimes and community types.

Burning to control hardwood re-sprouts

Results showed that hardwood re-sprouts generally grow back to about the same size as they were before being top killed from one fire-free interval to the next at a given fire return interval (one or two years). However, smaller re-sprouts do tend to get a little larger from one fire-free interval to the next, whereas larger re-sprouts appear to have reached an equilibrium where they do not get larger from one fire-free interval to the next (See figure below). This may be because of increasing competition for resources as the re-sprouts, and presumably their root systems, get larger over time. It may also be due to changes in above-ground versus below-ground allocation of resources within the plant, where smaller re-sprouts save more energy in their roots and thus can re-sprout to larger sizes after being top killed.

Timing of fire had an effect on resprouting, where burns conducted in the early growing season caused re-sprouts to come back at smaller sizes than when they were burned in the late dormant season, although a net decrease in total above-ground biomass was found only in native pine communities burned annually in the growing season.  Less vigorous resprouting in the growing season has been shown in other studies of the southeastern pine forests, attributable to greater above-ground allocation of resources within the plant during the growing season and therefore greater losses to fire. Changes in total above-ground biomass from one fire-free interval to the next were about the same under the one versus two-year fire return intervals, but mortality rates of genetic individuals were highest with annual burning.   

Management implications are that, in the short-term (a few fire-free intervals), hardwood re-sprouts will come back to about the same size as they were before burning, without some other treatment such as herbicide. However, over longer periods of time, growing season burns appear to resist growth hardwood re-sprouts more than dormant season burns, and annual burning permanently kills more of the hardwood re-sprouts than burning every other year, assuming the area was completely burned. Except for burning annually in the growing season in native longleaf pine communities, total above-ground biomass of hardwood re-sprouts is expected to reach an equilibrium under a given fire regime and community type.

Graph

Change in above-ground biomass (log transformed) of hardwood re-sprouts (circles) from the end of one 1-year fire free interval (t1) to the end the next 1-year fire-free interval (t2), showing the line for the best fit equation (solid bold) and 95% confidence intervals (solid light). Smaller re-sprouts return as larger re-sprouts, but larger re-sprouts return to about the same size.

Late Summer Land Management Recommendations


August Management Recommendations

 

Fire Ecology

  • Prescribe burn logging slash or build brush piles.
  • Finish growing season burns in native ground cover before arrival of fall.

Forestry

  • Plan for regeneration by conducting a visual survey of mature longleaf pine trees for cone production
  • Order seedlings early if regeneration is planned and cone crop is poor. Planting containerized seedlings in the fall can achieve better survival than waiting until later in the year.
  • If adequate cone crop, plan for site preparation burn to capture regeneration.
  • Mow between alternate rows within pine plantations to eliminate competition and create different heights of vegetation.

Game Bird

  • Supplemental feed at 1-2 bu/ac/yr.
  • Manage for nest predators if needed.

Land Management

  • Good month to spray herbicides, girdle or fell hardwoods.
  • Plant second round of millet in dove fields, for those who want grain available for the second phase of dove season.
  • Wetter dove fields should be planted with Japanese millet during this wetter month.
  • Plan deer survey route for spotlight counts (Florida only).
  • Mow roads and repair woods roads.

Vertebrate Ecology

  • Good time to replace worn-out artificial cavities for Red-cockaded Woodpeckers. Juveniles start roosting in cavities this time of year and will adopt clean cavities quickly.
  • Lake and pond draw-downs at this time of year can provide benefits for migrating shorebirds and wading birds.
  • Chimney Swifts begin to stage for migration and may use novel roosting sites, including the chimneys of abandoned tenant homes.
  • Swallow-tailed and Mississippi Kites gather in large migratory flocks and may forage over open fields.
  • Early songbird migrants appear; look for Yellow Warblers & Louisiana Water Thrushes along brushy wetland edges.
  • Hummingbirds that venture from breeding habitats may show up at feeders almost anywhere; maintain feeding stations.
  • Gopher Tortoise nests start hatching; keep heavy equipment away from tortoise burrows.
  • Allow some lightning-struck trees to die and decay naturally for the benefit of snag-nesting wildlife.

September Management Recommendations

 

Fire Ecology

  • Execute late growing season prescribed burns for native ground cover.

Forestry

  • Apply fall herbicides for control of hardwoods.
  • Conduct site-preparation burns to capture longleaf regeneration.

Game Bird

  • Begin to mow or chop hunting lanes in late September.
  • Mow thickets, and areas that were too wet to mow in the spring
  • Begin dog training.
  • Begin conditioning of horses and mules.
  • Continue supplemental Feeding at 1-2 bu/ac/yr.
  • Discontinue Predation Management.

Land Management

  • Plant fall food plots, if rainfall is sufficient.
  • Begin mowing or harvesting dove fields.
  • For those who want grain available for the third phase of dove season, plant second round of millet in dove fields.
  • Implement deer surveys to determine harvest strategy.
  • Apply herbicide for exotic grasses.
  • Apply herbicide for hardwood control.

Vertebrate Ecology

  • Fall songbird migration begins in earnest; watch for colorful birds along streamside zones and in hardwood forests.
  • Early Bald Eagles start to return to stake out territories and begin courtships.
  • Red-cockaded Woodpecker translocations begin; trucks in the woods at night may be helping this endangered species.

Economic Impact of the Red Hills Hunting Plantations

What is the Economic Impact of the Red Hills Hunting Plantations?

Quail hunt

Hunting plantations are a major economic driver in the Red Hills.

An important part of protecting the rural character of the Red Hills region has been Tall Timbers’ ability to demonstrate that these rural lands pay more than their fair share to support local services and infrastructure while also providing vital ecosystem services such as clean abundant water, fresh air, and wildlife habitat. 

Increasingly however, the message that truly resonates with elected officials and others who make decisions affecting the Red Hills can be summed up in one word: “Jobs.” While clean water and air is indispensable to everyday life, demonstrating the region’s economic and job-related impacts on local communities is crucial during this difficult economic time. 

Planning Coordinator Neil Fleckenstein is working on a project that will shed light on these important issues. This project will allow us to estimate the direct and indirect economic impact and job creation provided by Red Hills quail hunting properties. We believe this study will demonstrate what we have long known – that the Red Hills is a major driver of local economies and a significant contributor to the overall regional economy. 

One of the first steps in the process is developing and distributing a survey that will be sent to landowners and land managers throughout the Red Hills. This survey is a critical part of this project and the primary means of gathering the information necessary to allow us to estimate the overall economic impact and job creation associated with the Red Hills hunting community. Red Hills landowner participation is crucial as we must obtain a high response rate to accurately estimate the overall economic impact of the region. 

This project will play an important role in our continuing efforts to conserve the Red Hills and we would greatly appreciate your support of this effort. You will be hearing much more about this project in the coming weeks and months. Questions about this project can be directed to TTLC Planning Coordinator Neil Fleckenstein at 850-893-4153, ext. 335.